State v. Maltais’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
June 1928
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Adams · The People v. . Raymond · State v. Jenkins · State v. Sawyer · State v. Haynes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * a respondent is not made liable to them because of a prior conviction of any criminal offense, or of any of the various offenses created by the liquor law. The increased penalties are imposed for a subsequent violation of the prohibitions of the section. Hence, it is necessary that the prior conviction must be founded upon a charge of such violation.” State v. Maltais, 75 N. H. 248 ( 72 Atl. 1023 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kuhlman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.