¶1 If the court might have ordered the plaintiff to release the attachment as the price of the decree in her favor, it did not do so. The court’s refusal to make such order is a finding that it ought not to be made.
¶2 Exception overruled.
75 N.H. 607
76 A 191
Poleti v. Poleti
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 3, 1910
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1910-05-03
<p>Libel bob Divobce. Trial by the court and decree for the plaintiff. Transferred from the September term, 1909, of the superior court by Pike, J., on the defendant’s exception to the refusal of the court to dissolve an attachment of his property.</p>
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1975
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1910-05-03
View the full empirical analysis of this case →