Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 N.J. Super. 283 - State v. Berko

75 N.J. Super. 283 - State v. Berko’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2000

2 district · 8 state decisions

4019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell & Coggeshall Co. v. Kentucky Glass Works Co. · Goucher v. State · Coward v. State · 127 W. Va. 545 - State v. Barnhart · Walker v. Arkansas Nat. Bank of Hot Springs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Forgery: use of fictitious or assumed name,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any person who, with intent to prejudice, injure, damage or defraud any other person: a. Falsely makes, alters, forges or counterfeits any record or other authentic matter of a public nature or character, or any printed or written instrument or indorsement, acceptance, transfer or assignment thereof; or b. Utters or publishes as true, any such false, altered, forged or counterfeited matter, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited — Is guilty of a high misdemeanor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “definition with respect to the use of a fictitious or assumed name. The broad definition applies in a majority of jurisdictions, where it is settled that forgery may be committed by executing, or procuring to be executed, a written instrument in a fictitious or assumed name with intent to defraud. Annotation,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.