Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 N.M. 165 - Tevis v. McCrary

Tevis v. McCrary’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
July 1977
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Trust & Savings Bank v. Hermosa Land & Cattle Co. · Los Alamos Medical Center, Inc. v. Coe · Greenfield v. Bruskas · Chandler v. Battenfield · Goldenberg v. Law

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is implicit from the jury’s verdict that no special damages were awarded, and it is therefore incumbent upon the defendant to show in what manner the admission of this evidence was prejudicial. The defendant has totally failed to demonstrate how the admission of the exhibit operated to his prejudice. There is no showing in the record, other than pure speculation, that the introduction of this exhibit in any way influenced the jury. [ 75 N.M. at 167 , 402 P.2d at 151 ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.