Martinez v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2003
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County · Witt v. United States · State v. Thompson · Gruschus Ex Rel. Estate of Adams v. Bureau of Revenue · Owens v. Swope
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * *. It is our settled judgment that a consideration of all of the controlling statutes requires a construction that ‘good time’ allowances, for the purpose of final discharge from imprisonment, are only deductible from the maximum sentence provided by law. Owens v. Swope, supra [ 60 N.M. 71 , 287 P.2d 605 ], requires that construction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coutts v. Cox““An Act Relating to Narcotic Drugs and Marijuana; Amending Section 54-7-15, New Mexico Statutes Annotated, 1953 Compilation (Being Laws 1953, Chapter 25, Section 3, as Amended) ; to Prohibit Suspension or Deferral of Execution or Imposition of Sentence Under Certain Conditions; Increasing the Minimum Prison Sentence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Aragon v. Cox“resulted largely from a consideration of the history of the Iowa indeterminate sentence law and the various amendments to that state's Narcotic Drug law, as well as important differences between ours and the Iowa indeterminate sentence law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.