Jaramillo v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2020
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stambaugh v. Hayes · Burruss v. B. M. C. Logging Co. · Campbell v. Smith · Bland v. Greenfield Gin Co. · Shaver v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The ‘power of discharge’ is, however, only one of the elements to be considered ; it may be of primary importance in one case and of no consequences in another depending on the circumstances. Many other elements have been considered by the courts in determining the relationship between the parties and this led Mr. Justice Sadler in Huff v. Dunaway, supra, to comment: “ ‘ * * * what in many cases are considered satisfactory tests, in other cases and under different circumstances, are not satisfactory. * * * > »”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Abbott v. Donathon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.