Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 NY 55 - Dambmann v. . Schulting

Dambmann v. . Schulting’s Empirical Analysis

1878

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2014 · most notably Aaron Ferer Sons Limited v. Chase Manhattan Bank National Association (1984), Southwick v. First National Bank of Memphis (1881)

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 48 state decisions — followed in 13 states

130187818801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party buying or -selling property; or executing instruments, must,- by inquiry or examination, gain all the knowledge he desires. He cannot proceed blindly, omitting all inquiry and examination, and then complain that the other party did not volunteer all the information he had.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.