Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 NY 91 - Cowee v. . Cornell

Cowee v. . Cornell’s Empirical Analysis

1878

Citation profile

136
cited by 136 later decisions
17
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 128 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably 1 E.H. Smith 241 - Sage v. . Culver (1895), Barnard v. . Gantz (1893)

2 federal appellate · 128 state decisions — followed in 17 states

230187818801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It may be stated as universally true that fraud vitiates all contracts, but as a general thing it is not presumed, but must be proved. Whenever, however, the relations between the contracting parties appear to be of such a character as to render it certain that they do not deal on terms of equality, but that either on the one side from superior knowledge of the matter derived from a fiduciary relation, or from overmastering influence, or on the other from weakness, dependence, or trust justifiably reposed, unfair advantage in a transaction is rendered probable, there the burden is shifted, the transaction is presumed void, and it is incumbent upon the stronger party to show affirmatively that no deception was practiced, no undue influence was used, and that all was fair, open, voluntary and well understood. This doctrine is well settled.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.