75 Ohio App. 3d 219 - State v. Coulter’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
103 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably 102 Ohio App. 3d 28 - State v. Braxton (1995), 101 Ohio App. 3d 389 - State v. Clark (1995)
103 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Long · State v. Adams · State v. Maurer · Alexander v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Decisions regarding the calling of witnesses are within the purview of defense counsel's trial tactics[ ]' and absent a showing of prejudice, the failure to call witnesses will not be deemed erroneous.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceedings would have been different.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.