Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 Ohio App. 3d 22 - State v. Easter

75 Ohio App. 3d 22 - State v. Easter’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

131
cited by 131 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

131 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 166 Ohio App. 3d 371 - State Ex Rel. Petro v. Gold (2006), John Soliday Financial Group, L.L.C. v. Pittenger (2010)

131 state decisions

5201991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Adams · State v. Moreland · United States v. Whitworth · United States v. Chang An-Lo · United States v. Covello

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “does not require conclusive proof of authenticity, but only sufficient foundational evidence for the trier of fact to conclude that * * * [the evidence] is what its proponent claims it to be.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the decision to admit duplicates, in lieu of originals, is one that is left to the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.