75 Ohio App. 3d 409 - Morehead v. Conley’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
369 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 369 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably 103 Ohio App. 3d 236 - McGee v. Goodyear Atomic Corp. (1995), 84 Ohio App. 3d 806 - Schwartz v. Bank One, Portsmouth, N.A. (1992)
369 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Mitseff v. Wheeler · Bostic v. Connor · Joyce v. General Motors Corp. · Paugh & Farmer, Inc. v. Menorah Home for Jewish Aged
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 369 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Summary judgment shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, written admissions, affidavits, transcripts of evidence in the pending case, and written stipulations of fact, if any, timely filed in the action, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. No evidence or stipulation may be considered except as stated in this rule. A summary judgment shall not be rendered unless it appears from the evidence or stipulation, and only from the evidence or stipulation, that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is made, that party being entitled to have the evidence or stipulation construed most strongly in the party's favor.”
43 later decisions quote this exact passage“In reviewing the propriety of summary judgment, an appellate court independently reviews the record to determine if summary judgment is appropriate. Accordingly, we afford no deference to the trial court's decision in answering that legal question.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“Accordingly, we afford no deference to the trial court's decision in answering that legal question.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.