75 Ohio App. 3d 621 - Profeta v. Lombardo’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably 133 Ohio App. 3d 651 - Aristocrat Lakewood Nursing Home v. Mayne (1999), Liquidating Trustee of the Amcast Unsecured Creditor Liquidating Trust v. Baker (In Re Amcast Industrial Corp.) (2007)
3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. · 37 Ohio App. 3d 162 - Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery of Canton, Inc. v. DiMazzio · 65 Ohio App. 3d 791 - McKinley Federal Savings & Loan v. Pizzuro Enterprises, Inc. · Matter of Estate of Reed · 107 Ohio App. 66 - Conrad v. Sample
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Lake Toyota contends that its initial transfers to Frank P. Lombardo, for the purpose of circumventing the rules of the car show, were invalid since there was no valuable consideration exchanged when the vehicles were transferred back and forth between the parties. “Essentially, appellants want to use their initial scheme to commit fraud upon the car show as a defense to the later fraudulent transfers from Frank Lombardo to Lake Toyota. As the trial court aptly noted, appellants are related and both have ‘unclean hands.’ They cannot be allowed to benefit from their fraudulent schemes.” Id. at 627 , 600 N.E.2d at 364 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Unless displaced by this chapter, the principles of law and equity, including, but not limited to, the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency, or other validating or invalidating cause, supplement the provisions of this chapter.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.