Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 Okla. 127 - Herron v. Harbour

Herron v. Harbour’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2015

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

7019191920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gross v. Watts · Schley v. Pullman's Palace Car Co · Joiner v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co. · Thredgill v. Pintard · Jacoway v. Gault

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining the sufficiency of a certificate of acknowledgment, technical rules of construction will not be applied. A substantial and not a literal compliance with the statute in the certificate of acknowledgment to a deed, mortgage, or contract relating to real estate is all that the law requires, and, although words not in the statute are used in the place of others, or words in the statute are omitted, yet, if the meaning of the words used is the same, or they represent the same fact, or if the omission of a word or words is immaterial, or ean be supplied by a reasonable and fair construction of the whole instrument, the acknowledgment will be held sufficient.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The two essential averments to the validity of the certificate are the identity of the party who executed the instrument and that he did, in fact, acknowledge it.’’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.