Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 Okla. Crim. 42 - Bennett v. State

75 Okla. Crim. 42 - Bennett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1963
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1963

7 state decisions

40194219501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 37 Okla. Crim. 421 - Fromcke v. State · 70 Okla. Crim. 369 - Harjo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule of law is that an application to withdraw a plea of guilty is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court; the law favors the trial of criminal cases on the merits and where it reasonably appears a plea of guilty was influenced by persons in authority or apparent authority which has led a defendant to believe that by entering a plea of guilty his punishment will be thereby mitigated, he should be permitted to withdraw the plea of guilty and to enter a plea of not guilty, and the refusal to permit him to do so is an abuse of discretion. * * ⅜ * * * “A defendant should not be allowed to trifle with the court by deliberately, with the advice of counsel, entering a plea of guilty one day and capriciously withdrawing it, after several delays at the request of defendant, on the day set for pronouncing judgment."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A plea of guilty should he entirely voluntary by one competent to know the consequences and should not be induced by fear, persuasion, promise or ignorance.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.