Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 Or. App. 230 - State v. Self

75 Or. App. 230 - State v. Self’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
October 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2020

7 federal appellate · 4 district ·

9019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the time of the commission of the instant offense,- defendant was .serving a sentence in the Lane County Jail. -While at that facility, he telephoned one Webb, whose foster daughter he knew, in an attempt to obtain. Webb’s help in seeur-tag $2000 for the release- from jail of a third party, Brown. Defendant made about six phone calls, the first two to the foster daughter. During the fourth call, when asked by Webb about collateral, defendant for the'first time said that, after his'release, Brown would go to two places in Eugene and get the money to repay Webb. Then, as a further reward, Webb and Brown would go to San Francisco,- where Brown would obtain and give Webb five kilos of cocaine.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is unlawful for any person to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance. Any person who violates this subsection with respect to: (a) A controlled substance in Schedule I, is guilty of a ... felony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “one may be criminally liable in Oregon for soliciting the commission of a crime in another state, so long as that other state's offense has a counterpoint under Oregon law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.