Schoenrock v. Eib’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
July 1986
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Balfany
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Of course the respondent should have avoided all contact with jurors but for this court to hold that the trial court abused its discretion in holding that the record facts cast no just suspicion upon the verdict would be simply opening the door for setting aside verdicts because of some whimsey or fanciful notion conceived after an adverse verdict." 75 S.D. at 616 , 71 N.W.2d at 83 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fischer v. Knapp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.