Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 SO2D 699 - Porter v. Columbia County

Porter v. Columbia County’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2012

7 state decisions

201954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spafford v. Brevard County · Spafford v. Brevard County, Florida · Orange Belt Railway Co. v. Craver · Inland Waterway Develop. v. City of Jacksonville · 75 So. 2d 1 - State v. FLORIDA STATE IMPROVEMENT COM'N

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * The purpose of the eminent domain proceeding is to determine the value of the property taken and damage to the remainder, irrespective of ownership. Such questions as interest in the property, ownership, liens on property, may be determined in the same action in a summary proceeding after the jury has ascertained and rendered a verdict as to the value of the property taken and damages to the remainder."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.