Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 SO2D 810 - Stern v. Stern

Stern v. Stern’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2001

8 state decisions

30195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dehoff v. Imeson · Ring v. Ring · Phinney v. Phinney · Thompson v. Thompson · Slade v. Slade

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A court in a divorce action may, ... require the husband to give security for the payment of alimony or child support." Id. at 109 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.