Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 So. 3d 1112 - Thomas v. State

75 So. 3d 1112 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 941 So. 2d 735 - Rubenstein v. State · 650 So. 2d 846 - Giles v. State · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he jury should have been instructed that, if it believed Newell’s version of the events surrounding his altercation with [the victim], then it should presume that Newell used defensive force against [the victim] because he “reasonably feared imminent death or great bodily harm, or the commission of a felony upon him or against the vehicle which he was occupying.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.