75 So. 3d 30 - McFall v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 708 So. 2d 731 - Evans v. Lungrin · 628 So. 2d 1116 - State v. Foret · 419 So. 2d 460 - Bagents v. Bagents · 974 So. 2d 761 - Richardson v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.