Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

75 S.W.2d 449

Rose v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1934

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1934-10-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1938

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-10-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

KRUEGER, Judge.

¶1The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

¶2The record is before us without any bills of exception, and the statement of facts is not signed and approved by the trial judge. Therefore the same cannot be considered by this court. In the absence of a statement of facts, we cannot determine the insufficiency of the testimony to warrant the conviction. The indictment appears to be in due form, and, no fundamental error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

/75/sw2d/449 · .json · Public domain