Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

75 S.W.3d 345

In re Meng

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 2002

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2002-05-16

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2016

9 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-05-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellant, Michael R. Meng, appeals from the judgment of the probate division ordering him involuntarily detained at the Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center (SMMHC) for a 21-day evaluation. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in (1) allowing hearsay testimony regarding an alleged suicide note; (2) finding that Appellant represents a likelihood of serious physical harm to himself or others; and (8) finding that SMMHC is the least restrictive environment.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law or otherwise. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/75/sw3d/345 · .json · Public domain