Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

75 S.W.3d 787

Parks v. Parks

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2002

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2002-03-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2005

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-03-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order

PER CURIAM.

¶2Dan Parks appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. A published opinion would lack prece-dential value. A memorandum as to the reasons for our decision has been furnished to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

/75/sw3d/787 · .json · Public domain