Cooper v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1889
Citation profile
107 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Keck, Mahin & Cate v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh (2000), Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice Mills (1912)
107 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the transaction was fraudulent, Lee had a cause of action for its rescission growing out of the transaction itself, and four years is the period prescribed by our statute within which such action shall be brought.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.