Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 U.S. 15 - The Eagle

The Eagle’s Empirical Analysis

75 U.S. 15 · 1868

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
20
cited 20 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 22 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions (20 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2011 · most notably Crowell v. Benson (1932), Western Fuel Co. v. Garcia (1921)

22 federal appellate · 22 district · 8 state decisions

1801868187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nathaniel Waring v. Thomas Clarke · United States v. The Schooner Sally · Dean v. Younell's Aministrator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is insisted, however, that, if the court will take jurisdiction for a collision occurring on foreign waters and within foreign territory, the local law of the place of collision will govern, and hence the law of Canada in the present case and Smith et al. v. Condry, in this court, is cited as an authority for the doctrine [ 1 How. 28 , 11 L. Ed. 35 ]. The collision in that case occurred in the port of Liverpool, while the vessel of the defendant was coming out. The defendant set up in defense that by the statute law of England he was compulsorily obliged to take on board of his ship a Liverpool pilot, which he did, that she was exclusively in his charge when the accident occurred, and that this law, as construed by the courts of England, excused the owner and master of the vessel; and this was agreed to by the court, and applied to the case, the Chief Justice giving the opinion. All vessels entering into, or departing from, a domestic or foreign port, ,are bound. to obey the laws and well-known usages of the port, and are subject to seizure and penalties for disobedience; and, when submitting to them, they are entitled to all the protection which they afford. * * * Those are exceptional cases, and furnished no rule to the court below for the trial of the collision in question. It was tried there, as it should have been tried, according to the practice and principles of the courts of admiralty in this country, wholly irrespective of any local law.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We must, therefore, regard it as obsolete and of no effect, with the exception of the clause which gives to either party the right of trial by jury when requested, which is rather a mode of exercising jurisdiction than any substantia] part of it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all civil causes of admiralty jurisdiction upon the- lakes and waters connecting them, the same $s upon the high seas, bays, and rivers navigable from the sea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.