75 Wash. 2d 260 - Bailey v. Gallagher’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2008
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 45 Wash. 2d 278 - In RE PALMER v. Cranor · 75 Wash. 2d 271 - Riggins v. Rhay · 52 Wash. 2d 609 - In RE ALLEN v. Rhay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The function of a writ of habeas corpus is to inquire into the legality of the particular restraint being then imposed upon the petitioner. It is not to inquire into the validity of some future restraint that may or may not be imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Alba
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.