75 Wash. App. 626 - State v. Pham’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2017
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dutton v. Evans · 103 Wash. 2d 165 - State v. Ryan · 98 Wash. 2d 140 - State v. Parris · 70 Wash. 2d 690 - State v. Allen · 151 Cal. App. 3d 559 - People v. Carreon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“persons who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts, respecting which they are examined, or of relating them truly”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Woods“recollect details about an automobile accident in Canada which occurred a short time before the incident with Mr. Pham.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a constitutional right to a certified interpreter”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.