75 Wis. 2d 303 - Kelly v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

76 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.””

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 99 Wis. 2d 269 - Barrera v. State · 77 Wis. 2d 89 - State v. Spraggin

2. “there was an implied consent not only to aid the victim but to determine what had caused the death or injury and who was responsible.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Brown v. State · 494 So. 2d 750 - Bradley v. State

3. “[T]he authority which justifies the third-party consent does not rest upon the law of property, with its attendant historical and legal refinements, (citations omitted) but rests rather on mutual use of the property by persons generally having joint access or control for most purposes, so that it is reasonable to recognize that any of the co-inhabitants has the right to permit the inspection in his own right and that the others have assumed the risk that one of their number might permit the common area to be searched.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 217 Wis. 2d 531 - State v. Kieffer · 207 Wis. 2d 462 - State v. Kieffer