Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 75 Wis. 2d 344 - Johnson v. State

75 Wis. 2d 344 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
3
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably 117 Wis. 2d 701 - State v. Woods (1984), 96 Wis. 2d 531 - State v. Shaffer (1980)

4 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

280197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Gerstein v. Pugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[P]robable cause exists when the officer has 'reasonable grounds to believe that the person is committing or has committed a crime.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'quantum of evidence which would lead a reasonable police officer to believe'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Inquiry into the existence of and treatment for mental affliction is proper where it appears that a connection exists between the affliction and the reliability of the witness’s testimony . . . Trial courts possess considerable latitude in determining the proper scope of cross-examination, the matter resting in the sound discretion of the court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.