75 Wis. 2d 62 - Garski v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Walczak v. State (1985), 77 Wis. 2d 225 - State v. Evans (1977)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · State v. Reppin · 43 Wis. 2d 661 - Ernst v. State · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State · 50 Wis. 2d 540 - State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Cady
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Trial courts often required as a condition of probation that the defendant make restitution for all property or monetary losses caused by the criminal acts of the defendant which have been brought to the court's attention, although the defendant has been convicted or pleaded guilty only to one of them. In such situations, when the amount of the loss is determined on the face of the record or by defendant's admission, no problem arises as to the amount of restitution which can be made a condition of probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No statute [] allows the trial court to impose any other conditions, no matter how ‘reasonable and appropriate’ they appear, when the statutory penalty rather than probation is chosen. The evident purpose of the legislature is that each defined crime would have a proscribed [sic] maximum punishment, which may not be exceeded by the courts of this state. It is a well established proposition in our system of separate branches of government that the authority to punish is a matter for the legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“a defendant might be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty if he is able to prove by clear and convincing evidence that his plea was made under the following 35 No. 2014AP2488-CR.akz circumstances: '(3) the plea . . . was entered without knowledge . . . that the sentence actually imposed could be imposed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.