Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 750 F.2d 759 - United States Martin Steel Constructors Inc v. Avanti Constructors Inc

United States Martin Steel Constructors Inc v. Avanti Constructors Inc’s Empirical Analysis

750 F.2d 759 · 1984

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
5
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 10 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc. (1997), United Structures of America, Inc. v. G.R.G. Engineering (1993)

7 federal appellate · 10 district · 6 state decisions

2201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co. · Grosso v. Pennsylvania · United States ex rel. Johnson v. Morley Const. Co. · Glassell-Taylor Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the materials were supplied in prosecution of the work provided for in the contract; (2) he has not been paid; (3) he had a good faith belief that the materials were intended for the specified work; and (4) the jurisdictional requisites were met.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is to protect persons supplying materials and labor for federal projects.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a set-off defense is not available in a Miller Act claim in the absence of privity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.