United States v. Payne’s Empirical Analysis
750 F.2d 844 · 1985
Citation profile
55 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably United States v. Lindell (1989), United States v. Richardson (1985)
55 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1005 · 18 U.S.C. § 1006 · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 657 · 31 U.S.C. § 5316
Relies on Glasser v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To prove participation, the evidence must show that the defendant committed an overt act designed to aid in the success of the venture.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“this distinction is based on the legislative intent behind 18 U.S.C. § 1001”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To convict a defendant of aiding and abetting,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.