Perera v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
750 F.3d 25 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Raza v. Gonzales · Rivera-Cruz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ang v. Gonzales · Ahmed v. Holder · Amouri v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to reopen proceedings shall state the new facts that will be proven at a hearing to be held if the motion is granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tulung v. Garland“the BIA can take 'administrative notice of commonly known facts such as current events or the contents of official documents.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“exercised its judgment in an arbitrary, capricious, or irrational - 6 - manner”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tulung v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.