Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 750 F.3d 708 - Olson v. Morgan

Olson v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

750 F.3d 708 · 2014

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Farmer v. Brennan · Pruitt v. Mote · Grieveson v. Anderson · Riccardo v. Rausch · McGowan v. Hulick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow parties to oppose summary judgment with materials that would be inadmissible at trial so long as facts therein could later be presented in an admissible form.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “District courts are thus placed in the unenviable position of identifying, among a sea of people lacking counsel, those who need counsel the most.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “deciding whether to recruit counsel 'is a difficult decision: Almost everyone would benefit from having a lawyer, but there are too many indigent litigants and too few lawyers willing and able to volunteer for these cases.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.