Wu v. Stomber’s Empirical Analysis
750 F.3d 944 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 783 · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on 134 S. Ct. 568 - Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex. · Hydro Investors Inc Lawrence Taft v. Trafalgar Power Inc Marina Development Inc Arthur Steckler Trafalgar Power Inc · Premium Mortgage Corp. v. Equifax, Inc. · 85 F. Supp. 2d 282 - Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd. · GEICO v. Fetisoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a) the place where the injury occurred; b) the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred; c) the domicile, residence nationality, place of incorporation and place of business of the parties; and d) the place where the relationship is centered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“require that we apply the tort law of the jurisdiction that has the most significant relationship to the dispute.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). That inquiry”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As a general matter, we must apply the choice-of-law rules of the jurisdiction in which we sit-namely, the District of Columbia.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.