750 F. Supp. 2d 46 - Nelson v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
8 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Morrissey v. Brewer · Haines v. Kerner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cannot now relitigate an issue that has been 'actually and necessarily determined by a court of competent jurisdiction [because its] determination is conclusive'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was under no obligation to [execute the warrant and] conduct a revocation hearing while Plaintiff was serving the Maryland sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'federal agents performing a quasi-judicial function in making a parole determination in [plaintiff's] specific case[s],'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.