Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2018
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bieghler v. State · Norton v. State · In re Frey · Miller v. State · Vehorn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at least implicitly re-affirmed [its] decision to exclude it. Given the clear-cut nature of the proposed testimony (he asserts a sexual relationship; she denies it), we find the issue sufficiently preserved for appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“improve the reliability of the appellate court's guesses and estimates concerning the probability that the trial court's error was either prejudicial or harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reduce uncertainty as to the nature of the excluded evidence to a tolerable and acceptable level”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.