750 So. 2d 330 - State v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Jacobs · Morse v. Republican Party · 488 So. 2d 965 - State v. Rosiere · Kimberlin v. Quinlan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the record includes a complete transcript of the evidentiary portion of the trial, the appellant’s “constitutional right to a judicial review of all evidence” has not been compromised. State v. Thomas, 92-1428 (La.App. 4th Cir.5/26/94), 637 So.2d 1272 , writ denied, 94-1725 (La.11/18/94), 646 So.2d 376 , cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1054 , 115 S.Ct. 1437 , 131 L.Ed.2d 317 (1995). As to other untranscribed portions of the record, where there were no contemporaneous objections, the errors were not preserved for appeal. State v. Harrison, 627 So.2d 231, 233 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Entzi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.