Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

750 So. 2d 659

Pollock v. Couffer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 1999

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-10-01

Relies on Loughridge v. Carillo

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-10-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably Grant v. State (2000), 754 So. 2d 100 - Smith v. State (2000)

47 state decisions

450199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this consolidated appeal Willie Pollock challenges the final judgments of injunction for protection against repeat violence which were entered by the trial court against him upon separate motions filed by appellees, William Couffer and Larry Humphreys. Mr. Pollock contends that the evidence of record does not support the trial court’s rulings; however, he has failed to provide this court with either a transcript of the proceedings below or a stipulated statement of facts pursuant to rule 9.200(b)(4) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. This failure prevents us from reviewing the validity of Mr. Pollock’s claims. Since no error of law is apparent from our review of the final judgments, we must affirm. See Loughridge v. Carillo, 706 So.2d 138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

¶2AFFIRMED.

ANTOON, C.J., HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/750/so2d/659 · .json · Public domain