Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 F.2d 1398 - Gorman Carter v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Gorman Carter v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2011

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers Union · Bloomer v. Liberty Mutual Insurance · Galvan v. Press · Aetna Life Insurance v. Moses · Mitchell v. The Etna

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) that there was insufficient evidence to require the Special Fund administered by the petitioner to assume part of Belcher Erectors' liability to an injured employee pursuant to Secs. 8(f) and 44 of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “has force ... only when there is no apparent reason for the inclusion” of one element”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the desire to achieve disparate results,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.