Capraro v. Tilcon Gammino, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
751 F.2d 56 · 1985
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2008 · most notably Fink v. Golenbock (1996), Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance (1996)
10 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Angel v. Bullington · Penntech Papers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Isaac v. Schwartz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [T]he claim extinguished includes all rights of the plaintiff to remedies against the defendant with respect to all or any part of the transaction, or series of connected transactions, out of which the action arose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rhode Island state law ..., so far as we are aware, does not in connection with the principles of res judicata differ from the Restatement (Second) of Judgments or the law of Massachusetts or federal law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“alleged responsibility for the conduct of its wholly-owned subsidiary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.