United States v. Keithan’s Empirical Analysis
751 F.2d 9 · 1984
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Antonio J. Mazza, United States of America v. Anthony Decologero (1986), United States v. Perkins (1991)
15 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Hampton v. United States · Kennedy v. Powell · United States v. Honneus · United States v. Hemmer · United States v. Mann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“includes situations in which the declarant-- 20 .... 21 (4) is unable to be present or to testify at the hearing because of death or then existing physical or mental illness or infirmity.... 22 Fed.R.Evid. 804(a)(4). 23 It is well established that the infirmity of an elderly witness which prevents him or her from traveling is an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the most important factor to be taken into account in determining whether to allow the use of a deposition at a criminal trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.