Hurles v. Ryan

Decided May 16, 2014.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2014-05-16

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Hochendoner v. Genzyme Corp. (2016), Reese v. Cnty. of Sacramento (2018)

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-05-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Michael Aaron Harwin, Esquire, Law Offices of Michael A. Harwin, PC, Denise Irene Young, Denise I. Young, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

¶2Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.

¶3Before: HARRY PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

¶5ORDER

¶6The warden’s Motion for Ruling on RespondenL-Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed February 1, 2013, is DENIED. The parties may file a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc with respect to the opinion filed together with this order.

¶7IT IS SO ORDERED.