Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 F.3d 1307 - In re Packard

In re Packard’s Empirical Analysis

751 F.3d 1307 · 2014

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 1 (American Inventors Protection Act of 1999) · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 131 · 35 U.S.C. § 132 · 35 U.S.C. § 33 · 5 U.S.C. § 701

Relies on Phillips v. AWH Corp. · Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross · General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp. · Dickinson v. Zurko · White v. Dunbar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “includes both the written description and the claims”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.