In re Geller’s Empirical Analysis
751 F.3d 1355 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1052 (§ 2 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 2331 (Material Support to Terrorism Prohibition Enhancement Act of 2004) · 28 U.S.C. § 1295
Relies on In re Mavety Media Group Ltd. · Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo · In re Fox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) What is the likely meaning of the matter in question, taking into account not only dictionary definitions, but- also the relationship of the matter to the other elements in the mark, the nature of the goods or services, and the manner in which the mark is used in the marketplace in connection with the goods or services;, and (2) If that meaning is found to refer to identifiable persons, institutions, beliefs or national symbols, whether that meaning may be disparaging to a substantial composite of the referenced group.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Simon Shiao Tam · In re Tam
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.