Gilbert v. Donahoe’s Empirical Analysis
751 F.3d 303 · 2014
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a case and should dismiss it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) when the parties' dispute is subject to binding arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it appears certain that the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle plaintiff to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under our precedent, we may affirm on any ground supported by the record, including one not reached by the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.