Cartwright v. Garner’s Empirical Analysis
751 F.3d 752 · 2014
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Princess Lida of Thurn & Taxis v. Thompson · Penn General Casualty Co v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Schnader · United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co. · Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation · United States v. Ritchie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A Rule 12(b)(1) motion for lack of subject matter jurisdiction can challenge the sufficiency of the pleading itself (facial attack) or the factual existence of subject matter jurisdiction (factual attack).”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If two suits are in rem or quasi in rem, so that the court must have possession or some control over the property in order to grant the relief sought, the jurisdiction of one court must yield to that of the other.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.