Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 FSUPP 733 - United States v. Jacobs

United States v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
February 1992
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · United States v. Russell · United States v. Lovasco · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the Supreme court itself ultimately will validate the doctrine of outrageous conduct seems doubtful. In Hampton v. United States, [ 425 U.S. 484 , 96 S.Ct. 1646 , 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (1976) ] a three judge plurality opined that “[t]he remedy of the criminal defendant with respect to the acts of governmental agents, which far from being resisted, are encouraged by him, lies solely in the defense of entrapment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.