751 F. Supp. 2d 1063 - Sasser v. Hobbs’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Atkins v. Virginia · Penry v. Lynaugh · Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons · Ford v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] court must consider the Flynn Effect and the standard error of measurement in determining whether a petitioner’s IQ score falls within a range containing scores that are less than” seventy); Walker v. True, 399 F.3d 315, 322-23 (4th Cir.2005) (vacating district court’s opinion which dismissed the habeas petition, and remanding for consideration of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thorson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.