United States v. Morel’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3501 · 21 U.S.C. § 952
Relies on Lego v. Twomey · Crane v. Kentucky · Luce v. United States · Oregon v. Hass · United States v. Roldan-Zapata
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.